Louisiana State Auction Brickyard, Trader Joe's Pork Belly Recipes, Eurostar Train 9024 Seating Plan, Articles W

It is perfectly well explained within the parameters of the literary and theological character of the gospel itself. Im sure they were confused by Jesus lack of defense or attempt to escape. I cant remember if Paul mentions his Roman citizenship in one of the creditable letters I think he doesnt but anyway that is consistent with his having e.g. . respect. Is not doing the will of God ever justified? of spiritualities, mutating each other into new forms which creates Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. So Malchus was on the wrong side of historythe losing side. breach of the peace c) James and Judas. Jesus rebuked Peter and healed the man's ear, displaying the miraculous power of God (Luke 22:51). authority over them," Jesus is saying now. I couldnt remember what that tour guides interpretation of it was. We know Caiaphass track record, and from it we can deduce what a sad life Malchus must have lived in the shadow of this corrupt and vain high priest. They had come from the chief priest to arrest Him. He is all we need to be free. Peter, who cut off Malchus' ear, had a history of impulsive behavior. component of 2nd Temple Judaism; the religion, and source of He was sufficient in reporting important details so as to make a strong case to get Roman sympathy. The servant of the high priest lost his entire right ear when Peter swung in his direction! One such short appearance is that of a man named Malchus. On the Cutting off of Malchus' Ear. causing an affray Malchus reaches up to feel his head. For example, Often times, when I do marriage counseling, one person will tell a story one way, and another will add more details. On the day of Pentecost, alone, he showed that the sword of the kingdom is a spiritual sword. Is he smarting from being banned by Jerry Coynes blog for misrepresentation? Spiritually speaking, Christ wounds our hearts by the law and then heals them in the gospel. If a law is new but its interpretation is vague, can the courts directly ask the drafters the intent and official interpretation of their law? out of one mouth, this becomes a very great demonstration of the Comment: The suddenness of Peters reaction reveals a lack of forethought and patience. Then a sudden warmth. If the arresting party was hoping toreason with Jesus and get him to avoid causing a stir during the feast that might draw in Roman troops, or if they were hoping at worst to lock him away until after Passover, they may well have been trying to avoid an eruption of violence, even when provoked. We are in His image. You got me bang to rights. In Luke 22:50,51 - And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. are sharp. Could it be that along with the great company of priests who became obedient to the faith (Acts 6:7), Malchus came into the early assembly of the church? Peter would have no one to blame but himself if his discipleship and ministry had ended right at this point. Jesus' words flood back, " To seek and save the yourself have a strong idea of what I am talking about. Among the gospel authors, it was Luke, the physician, who described this miracle of the Heavenly Physician. Perhaps, there was no proof of an ear being cut off because it was healed by Jesus? John tells that the perpetrator of this crime was Simon Peter, known for his impetuous words and actions. And He touched his ear and healed him. the torches reappears. At the same time He was a merciful High Priest towards Malchus. The synoptics say (okhlos) multitude.) But in the past he has called mythicism a form of pseudoscholarship., http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/2014/07/scholarship-and-blogging.html. When pondering the seizure of Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane, I often get stuck over the enormity of what happened to Malchus. Luke 22:50-51: And one of them struck the servant of the high priest and cut off his right ear. Though we dont know what happened to Malchus, Peter went on to preach of Jesus Christ as the spiritual Healer and Restorer. "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life," Jesus is saying. If Jesus did not heal the ear that was cut off, then why was it not presented as evidence to aid in the requests for crucifixion? I cant imagine a univocalized meaning of the term that caught my eye. Later in Chapter 18, John records that a relative of Malchus witnessed Peter's assault in the Garden of Gethsemane, and identified Peter as a follower of Christ. While we could look at some spiritual and symbolical implications regarding his ear, Malchus' experience tells us something else: That he lost his ear by the hand of a disciple of Christ. Should we believe such an event to be historical? . alleged birthplace,Tarsus, then we can see his letters for what Thanks and no worries. Initially, his strike may have appeared to be sparked by a courageous and noble faith, but it was wrongly motivated. One can well imagine the armed Roman and Jewish soldiers being ordered to try first to reason with Jesus to stay calm till after the Passover hoping they didnt have to actually arrest him. Yet, they did not mentioned it. I don't say this with irreverence; I simply don't know how Jesus healed him. promoted over any subsequent copies in koine Greek? incognito, ear open for a seditious comment he can report back to . Through the darkness, the blade of a sword suddenly swung through the air. Robert Eisenman thinks Peter was antisemitic. Maybe it would have caused harm to Peter. Nevertheless, He then allowed these soldiers to bind His hands hands that had healed the sick, blessed children, and done so many miracles (John 18:8-12). Jesus reprimanded the violence, immediately dropped to his knees and miraculously healed the servant's ear. If the slave, for instance, stole from someone, Mr X was responsible for the slaves debt, inasmuch as the slave was part of his household. It is not our world. With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught." To argue over what happened to the severed ear renders the story to a lesser plane of meaning, an overly concretized set of concerns representing earthbound finite human rules of understanding, and negates the truth of divine intervention at every level of human existence. (If you're a human, don't change the following field). 11 Jesus commanded Peter, "Put your sword away! Malchus, a high priest's servant, has his ear severed by Peter during the arrest of Jesus, but after Jesus heals him, Malchus' hatred and rejection of Jesus disappear. To see the complete list,& More, The Net Pastors Journal, Eng. One indeed a dynamic background. Thus, Mark (and maybe Matt too) doesn't record the healing of the ear, because he doesn't want it to take away from his "final" healing of blindness symbolized back in ch10. His ear is whole, the bleeding stopped, only his blood-soaked cloak to indicate that there ever was a wound. them from all suspicion, and speaks clearly in behalf of the character The blood and the sword are stage props. That guy could then retweet it and tell the other apostles. find rest for your souls.". You are spot on. Demigods, Violence and Flood in Plato and Genesis [Biblical Creation Accounts/Platos Timaeus-Critias 7c], Primeval History from Cain to Noah [Biblical Creation Accounts/Platos Timaeus-Critias 7b], The Ambiguity of the Serpent: Greek versus Biblical, The Biblical Cain and his Greek Counterparts, Garden of Eden : Mesopotamian Perspectives, The Garden of Eden [Biblical Creation Accounts/Platos Timaeus-Critias 7a], The Second Creation Story in Genesis [Biblical Creation Accounts/Platos Timaeus 6], Inside the Pentecostal Christians Mind #1, Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier. for in many places they are convicted of discordance. blood. For other uses, see. at least the rulers he's familiar with. So different (And Malchus is a name meaning king, which isinteresting.). Now he did what he shouldnt have done. If you dont trust it, I would think that the natural default is to think that he was just another Palestinian Jew characteristic of the period, like Josephus. 1. You have stated your contrary opinion to the text that was quoted. Luke may have felt this detail was important to include. Armed with swords and clubs and torches, a band of about two hundred soldiers and temple guards arrived in Gethsemane, led by Judas. Though he is specifically named only in John 18:10-11, he is also found in Mark 14:45-49, Matthew 26:50-54, and in Luke 22:49-53 as the "servant of the high priest.". As Malchus is swept into a . He came with a detachment of soldiers and officials to arrest Jesus and was attacked by zealous Peter, who lopped off his ear. . "And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. What a blessing that Peter could continue as a servant of the real High Priest, Jesus, proclaiming His love and mercy to those enslaved to sin and formal religion. I will have to learn some more data about which language This High Priest, whose hands will soon be bound, will use His hands one last time to show kindness to an enemy. Recall in chapter 6:14-15 Jesus fled from the crowd when he learned they wanted to make him king. Following Judas traitorous kiss, Jesus confirmed their intention to take Him prisoner, choosing to yield Himself peacefully. Only John mentions Peter by name as the disciple who had drawn his sword and wounded Malchus. Was he helping his Lord here? If we had to add one sword stroke to the cause of our salvation, we would be lost forever. Documents written by a historical Jesus, as leader of a (There may additionally be some allusions to the Jewish War of 66-70+ but thats another discussion. The sword missed its intended target and instead cut off Malchuss ear. We read in Luke 22:51, And he touched his ear, and healed him. That must have meant that Christ bent down and picked up the ear and put it right back where it was. product of syncretic exchange. Jesus then healed Malchus' ear (John 18:10). What can a lawyer do if the client wants him to be acquitted of everything despite serious evidence? Malchus is aghast at what he has done, at his part in this Please take the, Hi Brad, welcome to BH-Stack Exchange, we are glad you are here. How did He do this in the life of Peter (think of his denial and restoration) and/or Paul (think of his conversion)? case in vendita gaeta vista mare what happened to malchus after jesus healed his ear So we see that Jesus wasn't approving of what Peter did. There is no healing. The healing of Malchus' ear also displayed the gentle & kind clam in Jesus in a time when others would be experiencing panic. In the 2004 Mel Gibson film The Passion of the Christ, Malchus is represented as an armed member of the temple guard. What you make of those passages will depend on your view of Acts. a role which is not exclusive to only one person, then So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers. Malchus listens as Jesus is founded on biased, weak analysis of comparative religion. identity for Judeans. ), 11Jesus commanded Peter, Put your sword away! Master. So, I have a couple comments / questions. This is a twist showing the highest of one kingdom going after another but, we are alien to this world. way which creates a boundary; to me, that is a sign of allegorical framing by a is read allegorically does it have a chance to make any real sense. Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?. After the Last Supper in the Upper Room, after Judas left to notify the chief priests that Jesus would be vulnerable, Jesus led His remaining disciples to the Garden of Gethsemane. (The Garden of Gethsemane grew flowers for perfume production.). As reigning high We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. The weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God (2 Cor. Moreover, for all we know,they may have subdued, or even killed, the person who sliced off the ear (assuming it wasnt Peter), after whichJesus prevented his followers from doing anything further. This shames us all! Just look at the mongrel comments that follow your expulsion nothing about the substance of the argument that led McGrath to go into his huff. When the Lord opens our eyes, we can see how much damage we do with our fighting. Pilate's quarters, hears the Roman's pathetic attempt at washing Good points. But if when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God. continues, "and I will give you rest. Your voice is unique. Healing the ear of a servant is one of the miracles of Jesus in the Gospels. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? ", "I always enjoy reading Neils blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest. This is not hermeneutical. In many ways, it is like St. Paul's experience on the road to Damascus, when the risen Lord appeared to him. He has heard amazing stories about Jesus and the people he has healed. What have I done to this kind, gentle man? (The servant's name was Malchus.) I think it is justified to consider the NT a Hellenistic anthology. How to notate a grace note at the start of a bar with lilypond? Your email address will not be published. I know there is much scholarship about why the NT was originally He has much detail with Jesus' care, His touch, etc. Despite this miraculous demonstration, the band of men who came with Malchus proceeded to apprehend Jesus, while the disciples fled in fear, refusing to . Luke 5:17 - the power of the Lord was present for Him to perform healing. Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. Ambivalence is written all over him. 5:2). Once the ear was cut off, Jesus healed it . Compare the later scene where he breaks the commandment by tearing his robes (Leviticus 21). creates a paradox in regards to supposedly The very loving and gracious Savior of the world. This is not the time for fighting. (See Matthew 1:18-25; Luke 1:26-38) In the Bible's New Testament, Jesus is the Messiah (the Christ) who was promised by the Bible's Old . writer who wants his character to fit a background ideology. pete it isnt clear why you are so anxious to acquire documents in Aramaic, which as the so-called lingua franca of the west of the Persian empire, has a position *exactly* symmetrical to that of Greek under the later eastern Roman imperium over much of the same terrain. ), They sent a large force (probably Temple guards, not Romans) of at least 500 men. Loved the piece about selling pork sausages to the High Priest cook. was a Mystic. ugly business. 'Jesus Revolution' leaves out the tough stuff but gets the music right, Sacked chaplain to appeal after losing employment tribunal case. https://storage.googleapis.com/wzukusers/user-27418862/documents/ace42f3179ec40e3944ba90deac4f5db/Introducing%20Inarah%20v8.pdf Your work and that of Wajdenbaum, Niesiolowski-Span,, I wouldnt make too much of it. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they dont have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. There is exactly nothing Jewish about the Aramaic language, it is a language of imperial domination. Here is a nice opportunity to do some source criticism, given the elements that are the same and those that are different. But the crowd has moved on now, torchlight diminishing, voices movement that spoke Aramaic, clearly purposed for the Perhaps the others are asking and Peter is acting. Malchus burns with shame. His concept is not so far anyway from the messiah, son of David, of the later rabbinical tradition where are they getting that stuff from? And isnt there some more meaning that can be looked into? Jesus' unbelievably gracious answer to his cry: "Father, forgive Healing the Ear of Malchus - Summary. Looking forward to more segments. MALCHUS - THE LAST MAN CHRIST HEALED. Luke was making a legal case that was deliberately selective so as to win influence. ", "I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed! Malchus served the high priest Caiaphas. . We know that he learned the lesson, for he wrote later, For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience, toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. The 12 were blind to Jesus identity in part 1 until Jesus helped them to see, and in part2 they were blind to his mission (dying on a cross) until the end, when they finally understood. As such, the addition may have been an important detail for Luke to add, given what he was trying to accomplish with his writing. So Luke obviously made it all up, but why? most powerful Jew in Israel. How do we know his name is Malchus? Stay up to date with the latest Christian news! This merciful act would be His last miracle before being crucified (Matthew 26:47-56; Mark 14:43-50; Luke 22:47-53; John 18:1-12). All the Why would they have done so? Addie, what I allude by pointing that the cutter was just Peter is that proto-John was likely a gnostic Gospel and therefore anti-petrine by definition. His experience with the Lord Jesus Christ, however, is something so amazing. He begins to wobble, blackness is engulfing INTERPRETATION. the narrow streets to Golgotha, just outside the city. (Matt 26:51; Mark 14:43f; John 18:10). The high priest's servant. The disciples are fulfilling prophecy, as if every character in this gospel and in particular in the Passion scenario. Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? Malchus ( / mlks /; Koin Greek: , romanized: Mlkhos, pronounced [mal.kos]) was the servant of the Jewish High Priest Caiaphas who participated in the arrest of Jesus as written in the four gospels. he asks. A soldier jerks Jesus to his feet and the spell of the moment is broken. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/2014/09/an-interpolation-in-1-thessalonians.html#comment-1598470837. yet Jesus heals him. especially about Jesus, the new healer who bears watching. Florence, Italy. They were carrying torches, lanterns and weapons. 12Then the detachment of soldiers with its commander and the Jewish officials arrested Jesus. Peters carnality echoes the approach of many nominal Christians, inspired more by the desire to outshine others instead of a sincere passion to honor and glorify God. Is there any legitimate reason given by scholars as to why Luke uniquely adds the account of Jesus healing the ear of Malchus after it being severed off? It was fun while it lasted. be your slave, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of a historical figure in their cultural habitat in terms of societal relationships. All four Gospels describe Malchus as a servant of the high priest. He loved Jesus deeply, but he sometimes let his strong emotions interfere with his judgment. been influenced by Philo, or another public writer The Lord had done a wonder on him, but where had that brought him? He is an agent of Jesus' arch enemy, Instead of focusing on the Jewishness of early Christianity, it Jesus healed the ear without having to reattach or regrow it, meaning that the man had a wound that healed and stopped bleeding. "Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. I was trying to dispense with Acts, pointing out that it is the only ground for thinking he is not e.g. Is McGrath boasting that he has an environment in which no-one, not even mythicists, feel victimized or insulted or misrepresented? Compare and contrast both lines of service. . Words of concern for him, an enemy, deeply involved in the Does the Gospel of Luke omit John the Baptist baptizing Jesus? . I bet he heard twice as good after that. When it is wielded with the blessing of the Spirit, it does indeed wound, but from heaven the Son of God heals spiritually . He "struck the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. thing is a very great evidence of their truth. But now my kingdom is from another place., Now that makes it look to me very much as if the incident of Malchuss ear has theliterary function of demonstrating Jesus message before Pilate: Jesus has commanded his disciples NOT to fight. But now Source: The Banner of Sovereign Grace Truth, 2013. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. This was Jesus' last recorded miracle prior to his resurrection. Only Luke records that Jesus healed the servant. The servant's name was Malchus" (John 18:10). Hellenism is the proper term for how various cultures Luke Chapter 22. By the Perhaps there was even a real clash of swords for a moment and maybe others were even killed but the evangelist didnt want to let anyone think the disciples were that bad so he minimized the damage done in his narrative. Jesus is the ear. sees himself as a servant, not a would-be dictator. One disciple flashes a It is likely that the high priest sent him, along with soldiers and Judas Iscariot, to capture Jesus (see Matthew 26:1-4, 14-16, 47-49). It must have happened quickly. Two of the three disciples who were with Jesus and fell asleep during Jesus' agony in Gathsemane were ____________ . is broken. Pilate asked what crime Jesus had committed. . Inthe land of Laputa modern-day inhabitants contemplate the deep mysteries hidden in the incident of Peter cutting off the right ear of the servant of the high priest and what such a very strange event could possibly meanfor the reconstruction of the life of the historical Jesus and the origins of Christianity. Pete, Im not sure I follow you. much more valuable than what is actually present to us. And it contains deep meaning and significance, too: It has long seemed to me that this incident might have had a significant impact on the way things unfolded for Jesus. John 18:10 tells us the servant's name was Malchus. Neil made a good synthesis of the work without being an expert of the field. Your clarification of Aramaic as a consequence of the exile tunic. Jesus picked up the ear and healed Malchus, rebuking Peter for his misplaced zeal. If Jesus really healed the servant of the High Priest, Mark would've mentioned it. They cart the lot down to the nick. Ill try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didnt want to wait . Pride is also evident in his action. What happened to the soldier that Jesus healed his ear? Copy. The Lord Jesus healed the slave, but whether he heard with an inner ear the truth about God at work in Christ Jesus we do not know. enemies. The mania for mystery cults in this sort of discussion was by the way characteristic of anti-semitic scholarship though of course it had other proponents. Surely, I am lost, says Malchus. times, nor in the same places, neither after having met together, and Comment: This tragic situation shows unbelief to be destructive, ugly, and cruel. The courtyard is astir with news of Jesus' capture. Yes, I need deeper understanding of semitic/oriental Peter was a fisherman, not a soldier. So Peter cut his ear off, yet Jesus healed him. 1. Shall we strike with the sword? d) Andrew and Peter. without pain. Pain ceases, and the flickering light of Peter had cut off Malchuss ear, but Christ restored it. But Jesus answered, 'No more of this!' And he touched the man's ear and healed him" (Lk. The Greek word for "ear" is otarion, and it refers to the entire outer ear. I thought you were the one occasional voice of sanity on his blog. The above ruminations from the planet of biblical studies are a classic nonsense and are one more example of the farce when scholars completely ignore the reality of the texts they are studying. If ever there was a situation that justified a little self-focus, one would think it would have been this time. This oversight has been corrected. If you are looking for me, then let these men go. 9This happened so that the words he had spoken would be fulfilled: I have not lost one of those you gave me., 10Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the high priests servant, cutting off his right ear. We don't know whether Jesus touched Malchus and a new ear grew or whether Jesus reached down and said, "I think this is yourshere" and reattached the ear to his head. he was not a pious Jew like the standards we know in the But the contrary, it may be said, has come to pass, Detail of Fra Angelico, "Arrest of Christ" Luke 22:47-51 Also read: Matthew 26:51-54, Mark 14:44-47, John 18:10-11. Zombies rising from their tombs and wandering round the city are one thing. ), 36 Jesus said, My kingdom is not of this world. . In John, Simon Peter is named as the one who wielded the sword and Malchus is named as the slave. Hence the name Malchus and the allusion to king appears. Luke 22 is the only gospel that records the . was sufficient; but if there be four that write, not at the same existed in the period from the execution of the last His words 3pages. I appreciate your viewpoint on Hellenism as a mistaken and soaks his hair and beard to dissolve the remaining blood. And it may be that the harm was great. Reasons for thinking that Paul was not as much a native speaker of Aramaic as of Greek are basically nil by the way. Malchus must have his ear restored, and so it was. Josephus and other data. together, and had written what they wrote by some human compact; In this depiction, Jesus heals Malchus' wounded ear, leaving the latter to stay behind sitting dumbfounded in a state of disbelief, suggesting a possible conversion to . The arrest did not take Jesus by surprise. People are no better today. Imo. Jesus served the Father who is not a religion. Jesus had just told Peter that he would deny Him, but here we see Peter standing up for Jesus. Touch by John Ferguson portrays Malchus as a Roman soldier sent by Pilate to spy on the Sanhedrin. of Nazareth, who is visiting for Passover. myself into the original post by saying that any supposed dialogue Jesus has the divine power to zap everyone but he is in control and has chosen to die instead. Just because of the symbol of servitude? If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. Suddenly, they encounter someone "No more of this!" Jesus immediately responded as He touched the bloody wound and the ear was healed (Luke 22). Maybe he added it because it appealed to his line of work, and was fascinating to him. Presupposing a strong oral tradition which gives firm basis for atleast veridical And thats exactly how Christ intervened with His erring disciple. Lately, he has been dispatched to learn about Jesus, prophet filled with a gentleness and love that melt all enmity. b) Peter and John. The ear is there (c.1450). and soldiers converge, their torches casting eerie dancing Jesus Christ exhibited great power ( John 18:6) and mercy ( Luke 22:51) when He restored the ear of Malchus, a servant of the high priest who had come to arrest Him in the Garden of Gethsemane. Malchus was the head servant of the High Priest. He cannot forget the hand on As far as I know the only reason for thinking that Paul was not just another Palestinian Jew characteristic of the period someone to be ranged alongside, say, Josephus comes from Acts 9:11 21:39 22:3 where Tarsus is mentioned. One can hope! It was a part of the plan. In the 2004 Mel Gibson film The Passion of the Christ, Malchus is represented as an armed member of the temple guard. He was not a soldier. Pauls raw data is To say that Paul was advancing a hellenistic mystery cult is basically saying he was advancing an oriental or semitic mystery cult, in other words, that he was advancing some form of Judaism. "You are my ear, boy," says Caiaphas the High Priest to his Malchus, breathing hard, Firstly, Peter would swing his sword vertically (up and down)and this was highly unlikely because of the awkwardness of the movement. Receiving no help from His disciples in prayer, the Savior accepted the cup of His Father and prepared to meet the power of darkness. Moreover, it was a great bridge to what Christ would do in His state of exaltation following His death and resurrection. Jesus concludes. It was me wot sold the pork sausages to the High Priests cook. But Jesus said in reply, "Stop, no more of this!". To answer your question: There is no problem with healing if the Markan original of Johns scene was a scene in a performed play. same result. Certainly nothing in his writing that suggests even a remote connection with Alexandrian Judaism or even Alexandria, much less with Philo himself, with whom he shares absolutely no characteristics. Do you think that Was not Luke a physician? What a mercy that it didnt! Here is the scene from the Gospel of John chapter 18 (NIV): 3So Judas came to the garden, guiding a detachment of soldiers and some officials from the chief priests and the Pharisees. vengeful, so petty, so filled with hatred. He cannot forget those Doubting an Oral Tradition behind the Gospels: The Parables, Why Christianity Happened The Secular Approach, 2, Book of Revelation Annotated List of Posts, Daniel Gullottas Review of Richard Carriers, Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son (Levenson), Ending of the Gospel of Mark (16:8) ANNOTATED INDEX, Genre of Gospels, Acts and OT Primary History: INDEX, Historical Methods (with reference to the study of Christian Origins/Historicity of Jesus), Plato and the Biblical Creation Accounts (Gmirkin), Thanks, but sadly no.