I don't think any of the options you listed will give you problems.As you can see, people's opinion are basicly based on which grinder they have, and how many downvotes they can throw at any opinion not considering the grinder they are using. His reviews are rather lacking in consistency would you not say. To make a virtue out of using the more expensive Mazzer burrs on account of the Niche’s flimsyness to handle the Italmill burrs is misleading. It came with other burrs but the reviewer suggested that it would be a better advert for the product if genuine mazzer burrs were used, as after all they are well considered within the industry. Just 2 of them. I have done and it didn't cause any problems probably because it would be a bit extreme to call what it puts out clumps even with the bean I am using. The only reason I would choose the niche over the Specialita is if you are only single dosing and like its looks. Please can you confirm your interest in all of this. Plus the lack of purging alone means the Niche pays for itself after 8 years vs the other grinder....based on your consumption and the fact that it will save you wasting around 4.5kg of coffee per year (@15 per Kilo) due to not having to purge and getting exact weight out.

For the accuracy people often want the time setting will need changing from time to time. Aeropress and Aergrind Niche were in favour of the cheaper set (obviously). A shill, also called a plant or a stooge, is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization. I know which I would choose. It's harder than you think to get genuine Mazzer burrs and a lot of places who list them as genuine are selling non OEM inferior Italmill ones, I know this from the testing I did! It's probably true that it's louder than other grinders - can hear it across multiple rooms. Do you want a grinder that is capable of self destructing
Clumping if firm enough interferes with water flow through the puck and it's variable. Kenny, I have no beef with you. Stop talking your usual vitriolic bollocks Nikko. Alot seems to be made of the digital interface and timer, those things seem to be "noise" to me. if you do not like this forum then piss off Ich bin heute den ersten Tag im Forum und suche nach einer Antwort auf meine Frage. The Niche Zero is a stonking grinder, read my Niche Zero review – but it’s a completely different grinder to the Eureka Mignon, and it’s not in the same price range, at £499. Niche had a choice of 2 burrs, one presented greater loads on the motor with no advantage in any other respect. I was simply pointing out that recommending the Niche over the Eureka by making a virtue out of the Niche’s inability to drive the Italmill burrs is misleading.

I do this as a hobby, I'm not in business and receive no payment for my work a full disclosure is, and always has been, on my review and YouTube sites. I have the niche and the specialita. eureka mignon specialita vs niche zero; Reply to this topic; Start new topic; Prev; 1; 2; Next; Page 1 of 2 . When the two sets of burrs were compared, the Mazzer burrs produced a better set of results than the others, so despite the obvious cost disadvantage, they were selected.Indeed, one burr set presented a greater load on the motor in return for greater throughput. Glad to hear that you agree with what I wrote. People might be inclined to think that a grinder with a timer on it will always generate the same dose of grinds.

I don't have any other opinions at the moment on which is better.I haven't tried the Sette, but I have the Eureka Mignon Filtro and love it. I'm still playing around with flat vs conical burrs in terms of flavor. Ive used other mignon grinders if not this one. I do not believe there is anything misleading in what I said. It's retain less , well practically nothing , and is a true "single doser". Nice fluffy ones that are free from clumps tend to be favoured. Whether you consider greater throughput an advantage is up to you, but clearly the Niche grinder could not handle that burr set reliably.

I'm happy with it, but haven't owned either of the others.

After testing the advice was to put in the dearer burrs. It was the Niche which failed because it is too weak and flimsy for these burrs.
Flimsy - unsubstantial, easily damaged. if you do not like this forum then piss off Please can you confirm your interest in all of this. People do all sorts with some grinders to minimise it such as stirring up the grinds. So is it worth the £150 extra, for sure. I can well imagine that Niche were initially in favour of the cheaper burr set but went along with the more expensive one because their grinder could have self destructed with the cheaper burrs as you correctly say. Davecuk says quite clearly in his review that Niche adked him to test 2 sets of burrs and his findings were that the Niche could not manage set B, later identified as Italmill. you misunderstand if you think I am attacking the Niche - I have no financial interest in promoting or dissing any grinder. No need for the final paragraph?

Niche apart from when certain items in it are cleaned what goes in comes out. There have been comments - lacks the "punch" that big flat burrs give. Would people make a similar comparison between a small eureka grinder and a mythos , probably not. fair play to Nikko to keeping objective and respectful. A more thorough clean might need a few more.

The Niche was never designed to take Mazzer burrs. How do you define burr quality?No experience with Eureka grinders, but if you are happy to run the same bean with a hopper and prefer lighter roasts, you might be better off with Niche. It came with other burrs but the reviewer suggested that it would be a better advert for the product if genuine mazzer burrs were used, as after all they are well considered within the industry.

So is it worth the £150 extra, for sure. Still good to hear that he is now a big fan of Mazzer burrs. Stop talking your usual vitriolic bollocks Nikko.