Coverity is quite expensive. Klocwork rates 4.6/5 stars with 11 reviews. Save See this . Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Klocwork rates 4.6/5 stars with 11 reviews. (Coverity has a press release on my former employer, so I can say that it did help find and fix lots of bugs in our C/C++ code, more than I'd found in all my previous career in bug hunting.) Running Klocwork every day/some other set period of time can't be done from the app itself; we had to create a cron job to do so. 业界发明了程序静态分析（Program Static Analysis）技术，静态分析是指在不运行代码的方式下，通过词法分析、语法分析、控制流分析等技术对程序代码进行扫描，验证代码是否满足规范性、安全性、可靠性、可维护性等指标的一种代码分析技 … InfoWorld: Coverity and Klocwork code analyzers drill deeper : "Remarkable increases in hardware performance are enabling the design and creation of tools that were simply not possible years ago.With two processor cores tearing through 3 billion instructions per second, it's now possible to devise tools that perform rich, very thorough analyses very quickly." I work for a large software company with 2000+ engineers and architects. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward. 違反コード (境界外ポインタの生成) 以下の違反コード例では、関数 f() でindexの値を検証してから整数配列 table のオフセットとして使用しようとしている。 しかし、関数は負の index 値を受け取ってしまう。index がゼロより小さいと、関数の return 文の中の加算式の動作は、未定義動作 46 になる。 Klocwork is a close competitor of Coverity... cost-wise they are about the same ( look carefully, Klocwork looks cheaper until you actually buy what … For Java.... well, it helped find a lot of resource leaks ( #$@^#ing Java developers seem to forget that resources like file handles aren't garbage collected ), but it doesn't seem to find many "critical" bugs. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews. Coverity is ranked 12th in Application Security with 5 reviews while Klocwork is ranked 9th in Application Security with 9 reviews. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Klocwork writes "Enables us to resolve violations but it needs integration with Agile DevOps and Agile methodologies". See what sort of things they find.

More Coverity Pricing and Cost Advice » Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx, Polyspace Code Prover and CodeSonar, whereas Klocwork is most compared with SonarQube, Polyspace Code Prover, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand and CodeSonar. The top reviewer of Coverity writes "Improves security by detecting vulnerabilities in code, but it needs integration with popular development environments". Recognizing accurate code issues sometimes poor. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.Synopsys Static Analysis helps reduce risk and lower overall project cost by identifying critical quality defects and potential security vulnerabilities during development, with accurate and actionable remediation guidance, based on patented techniques and a decade of research and development and analysis of over 10 billion lines of proprietary and open source code.Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting. Coverity Prevent has an impressive public track record for finding bugs in open source C/C++ code, but their Java product is a lot newer. reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference Klocwork is a close competitor of Coverity... cost-wise they are about the same ( look carefully, Klocwork looks cheaper until you actually buy what you need ), and feature-wise they fight back and forth.For C/C++, it's great. Compare Coverity vs Klocwork. Coverity, though, has been taken over, and made little progress in its C/C++ checkers in the last decade; but they are still worth running. Coverity (38) 4.2 out of 5.

Klocwork has provided a very good documentation for each and every checker by providing documentation which will consist of some examples. Coverity rates 4.2/5 stars with 38 reviews. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews.We use cookies to enhance the functionality of our site and conduct anonymous analytics.

Klocwork has very good number of Checkers list. We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. reviews by company employees or direct competitors. Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. Klocwork and other solutions. With your permission, we may also use cookies to share information about your use of our Site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Coverity.

with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.Source code composition analysis helps with vulnerabilities and license complianceImproves security by detecting vulnerabilities in code, but it needs integration with popular development environments