More than 90 percent of criminal cases are currently resolved by plea bargain.Because in most cases, plea bargaining has the potential to benefit both sides mutually, many people regard plea bargaining as a benefit of the criminal justice system.

And of course, the court system is relieved from possible clogging.Lane Cummings is originally from New York City. On the one hand, the prosecutor gets a guaranteed conviction. People believed prisoners could be reformed into productive, law-abiding citizens if they were given tools such as education, occupational credentials, connections and supportive programs to facilitate successful reintegration into society.By the 1970s, however, criminal psychologists were convinced rehabilitation wasn't working, and they began pushing for an alternative approach, based on the work of sociologist Robert Martinson, who published a subsequent report concluding that when it comes to deterring criminals, "nothing works." Some say the fact that the court doesn't appoint both the defendant and the plaintiff a public defender gives the rich a sometimes unfair advantage.The prosecution in a criminal case may offer a plea bargain, which is a deal offering a lesser sentence or some concessions in exchange for a defendant's guilty plea. It includes the defined set of procedures, rules, requirements and limits our courts and other institutions use to enforce the criminal law. The criminal justice system in any country takes up much of the public coffers which if unchecked may place a necessary burden to the taxpayers. The advantage of social law and order is therefore bound inextricably with the criminal justice system's purpose for existing at all.Enshrined within the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is the right to due process. The criminal justice system represents the evolution of the collective social morality of our society expressed in laws implemented through democratic policy to balance competing rights and values with a belief in fairness. The fifth amendment of the United States Constitution says that the government cannot require someone to provide potentially incriminating testimony. It is important to note that the defendant is not technically obligated to raise her own defense, as the burden of proof is always on the accuser. 5. Historically, most of these systems were religion-based, barbaric by current standards and rarely just. Your right to due process, and by extension your right to an attorney, is one of the benefits you will have as a criminal defendant. If the accused cannot afford an attorney the court will appoint one for him, often referred to as a public defender. The costs can also impair a … However, this pro can sometimes turn into a con when you consider the fact that wealthier people accused of crimes can usually afford more expensive attorneys who have more experience, graduated from more prestigious law schools and who have been mentored by elite legal professionals. This amendment keeps the burden upon the prosecutor to find witnesses who will do exactly that.The fact that everyone accused of a crime has a right to an attorney is a definite pro of the criminal justice system. With few exceptions, a single drug conviction typically carries a relatively light penalty, and the defendant could probably expect to serve about two years in prison or less. The Three Components of the Criminal Justice System This system prevents every single trial from going to court and thus overcrowding the court system to the point where it simply can't function. Other institutions that play a role in the criminal justice system include the police, custodial institutions, correctional facilities, and trial and appellate courts.

The cons of the criminal justice system are founded in the costs involved in running and improving it. The judicial role is to hear both sides of a criminal case, review evidence produced by each party, listen to the testimony of witnesses, read the final verdict given by the jury if applicable, and deliver a fair sentence based on the circumstances of the case in the broader social context of the crime.For the benefit of the court, both sides are to argue opposing positions and present supporting evidence for each.