However, what is obvious is that they I don't believe that there is consensus for all of Most of this seems okay; however, there are a couple of problems. The Joint Measurement Board website doesn't appear to mention hands but its references to measurements seem to be centimetres first. I believe we're all on-board with this, so I have added a comment to "The pound sterling is represented by the £ symbol, with one horizontal bar. over use of unambiguous (but less familiar) IEC binary prefixes.

Why not add something about not naming decades in just words, as in It's probably best to avoid such phrases at first-use, but allow them subsequently: — This strikes me as rather unfair. EEng reverted this; for presumably good reasons. There is no consensus that YYYY-MM is an acceptable format, nor any consensus that it is an unacceptable format. This is even more true if we go back to the medieval or ancient events. At Jonesey and Kahastok, please add all the baseball and cricket units to the table, working in The ones you chose were probably 50% of the incorrect usage. A$52)". This is a typical Talk:MOS waste of time and brainpower. The guidelines state: I believe they are wrong on the following points:

WP needs to present info, in the way that allows users to see the data in the way everyone else publishes it. La prenotazione è veloce e senza alcun costo aggiuntivo.

If so, which ones?

Yes, I think you're right. As early as 2006, it was realized that readers who were not logged in would see dates in the YYYY-MM-DD format. Archon, you write "Since decimal fractions are just a different way of representing the same numbers it's not obvious why they have to be treated differently". "In quantities of bits and bytes, the prefixes [..] tera (T), etc. over use of IEC binary prefixes. Dondervogel 2 19:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC) I see that, in December 2010, it was determined by consensus that you were, and had said, you would stop at nothing to get the IEC prefixes into Wikipedia. Continuing on from Part 2 and Part 3 above, I will restate it so that contributors brought in for the RFC can see the problem. Ecco i nostro consigli per viaggiare sicuri, senza consumare troppo.Con Skyscanner trova il tuo biglietto aereo al miglior prezzo.

Should the abbreviation be spaced from the number or not? I'm confused by this question on several levels.
Non perdere le novità e le buone dritte per i tuoi spostamenti. Typesetters have been able to use special symbols for a long time, longer than computers – indeed before computers as we know them even existed. Their unambiguity is a strong argument in their favour: it's not unreasonable for Wikipedia to prefer rational formats, whether "reliable sources" use them or not (bear in mind that Wikipedia does not defer to sources for unit choice). However, my interpretation in these instances is from reading the concerns expressed in the discussions of the issue, not the actual statement of the consensus. I believe I recall reading at least one more longer discussion which I am just not finding right now. . Wikipedia could educate the world on the correct way to measure computer memory. It is conventional bibliographic practice that multiple works by the same author(s) in a given year are distinguished by suffixing a lower-case letter to the year.

Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 hands-on preview and video. The choice of format is a matter of aesthetics, and it matters little if different articles adopt different formats, though each article should be internally consistent. Surely we'll be sticking to one citation style for all references which should in turn ensure that all publication dates be in the same format. "100-m bridge"), and periods with unit symbols ("100 m.") should be avoided — I cannot see this in the current guidance. So, like I said, it's mostly fine though a bit over-the-top in parts and seems to imply that unit names are somehow special noun that defy the rules of grammar. It is the same principle, but I don't mind that we make it consistent, state explictitly that £ can only mean the British pound? Use ... consensus on Wikipedia in computing-related contexts currently favours the retention of the more familiar but ambiguous units "KB", "MB", "GB", "TB", "PB", "EB", etc. Adding examples of both correct and incorrect usage can help greatly, especially if the reader's English comprehension is not the best (and for whom the guide is most useful).

One might similarly confuse a load expressed (for example) in kg/mAnyway, I've expanded the group names again to, I hope the satisfaction of all. Iscriviti alla Newsletter ViaMichelin.Grazie! Use ... consensus on Wikipedia in computing-related contexts currently favours the retention of the more familiar but ambiguous units "KB", "MB", "GB", "TB", "PB", "EB", etc. Isn't the single-barreled £ also ambigious (with the Egyptiab pound)? See CMS-13 §15.91, Turabian-5th §8.13.) MOBIW.RU 2009-2020 Сайт Позитива и Хорошего Настроения! see Scottish Horse had this headline: Measuring Horses and Ponies - ongoing controversies There is no way that I can be dogmatic about ponies and horses.

The IEC prefixes are certainly used in the real world (for example, my Linux desktop gives information in IEC units only). The conflict comes when we get a reference that has only year and month (typical of magazine references). But then this causes a conflict with DATEUNIFY, which forces us to replace The talk page discussion was only among a small set of contributors over a short period of time, so the repercussions were not obvious and were not thrashed out. If not, perhaps this language can be clarified? Some of the history of earlier discussions on this issue is contained in the following archives: After two months of looking for acceptable solutions, none of the solutions presented in Part 2 found consensus and only the following were found to have any followers: Should this be plural, or should the rule be rewritten? Mon closed. I wander shouldn the MOS then be clarified to "(e.g. The enthusiast-oriented GX1 features a 16MP sensor, touchscreen interface and an abundance of external buttons and dials.